tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4878800127977294363.post5473729001740465808..comments2023-07-09T18:10:13.634+05:30Comments on SENSE OF LAW: DISTINGUISH BETWEEN RES SUB JUDICE & RES JUDICATAVijayalekshmi Omanahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02646106796746412847noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4878800127977294363.post-90136472949158559272012-12-04T20:03:24.049+05:302012-12-04T20:03:24.049+05:30thanx .... ms. omana for making the concept more c...thanx .... ms. omana for making the concept more clear Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4878800127977294363.post-13137962818127012632012-11-29T21:59:15.830+05:302012-11-29T21:59:15.830+05:30i am no more confuse after reading this.i am no more confuse after reading this.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08235332534155871666noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4878800127977294363.post-63352466948687692132012-01-02T02:21:54.523+05:302012-01-02T02:21:54.523+05:30not use clear and obvious language .please explain...not use clear and obvious language .please explain it clear with easy illustration thanksMuhammad yousaf khiljinoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4878800127977294363.post-57946450318717496282012-01-02T01:38:24.543+05:302012-01-02T01:38:24.543+05:30it is same as copy into book still that mixims is ...it is same as copy into book still that mixims is not clear and no example is given in above mizimsyousaf khiljinoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4878800127977294363.post-13096956760908762362011-07-04T18:55:18.177+05:302011-07-04T18:55:18.177+05:30nice right therenice right theremarvin lutakomenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4878800127977294363.post-785091287930534142011-04-23T19:17:50.134+05:302011-04-23T19:17:50.134+05:30Some of the maxims of Res Judicata
Interest republ...Some of the maxims of Res Judicata<br />Interest republicae ut sit finis litium ( It is in the interest of the state that there should be an end to a litigation)<br />Nemo debet lis vaxari pro uno et eadem causa (No man should be vexed twice for the same cause)<br />Res judicata pro veritate occipitur (A judicial decision must be accepted as correct)<br />Explanation IV of the Res Judicata explains constructive Res judicata. It is based on 'might and ought' principle. Any matter which might and ought to have been made ground of defence or attack in such former suit shall be deemed to have been a matter directly and substantially in issue in such suit.<br />When we co-relate the above explanation to the maxims it is very clear that the principle behind the explanation is to compel the plaintiff to take all claims and allegations against the defendant in the first suit. A later suit based on such allegations is barred as per the explanation because when deciding on merit with the later allegations which ought to have made in the previous suit, a different decision in conflict with the previous decision is possible. So its all provided for doing justice and based on justice.Vijayalekshmi Omanahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02646106796746412847noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4878800127977294363.post-55406935301223172812011-04-22T21:01:47.093+05:302011-04-22T21:01:47.093+05:30still its incoherent..i need to know more regardin...still its incoherent..i need to know more regarding constructive and collateral in issue under res judicata and some maxims related to it..anshul kathaitnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4878800127977294363.post-83884346970023018922011-03-10T13:04:01.622+05:302011-03-10T13:04:01.622+05:30Good writing....if more distinction is added then ...Good writing....if more distinction is added then it will be more better than before...Mamun or rashidnoreply@blogger.com